| Using technology to face demographic change |
It also would cost £5m to use nationally to provide the outpatient care of patients with stable prostate cancer rather than £23m for consultants, £19m for nurses or £15m for the GP alternatives.
Jon is leading the NHS improvement workstream on stable prostate cancer from a clinical point of view and is part of a group who have been using prostate tracker software to keep an eye on prostate cancer patients in the community. This is an interesting use of technology but the downside is of course that a doctor or nurse still has to sit in a hospital looking at all of the results to decide if the patient is safe or not. Although the costs charged to the community are cheaper the cost of providing the service is not any different and as per yesterdays post it looks like it costs in reality £112 per patient if a consultant talks to the patient versus £94 for the nurse. So the community gets a good deal and the hospital edges closer to bankruptcy! The ASIMOV system takes the patients blood tests and clinical details to produce a clinical management advice letter following national guidelines, providing safe care every time.
As in industry, the only way we are going to be able to provide safe care for the ever growing number of patients with chronic disease is to harness new technology to help less trained people to do the work of more specialised employees. We can barely afford the workforce we have, let alone the one we need with the demographic challenges of the future.
Let me know what you think!